~azzar1/unity/add-show-desktop-key

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
IVLE File Browser Design
========================

    Author: Matt Giuca
    Date: 7/12/2007

This is the design for the file browser *and* editor components of IVLE.

They are now very closely integrated, sharing a common backend.

A prototype is available that I hacked up in Ajax/Python, available at
/trunk/prototypes/browser.

Separation of components
------------------------

The issue has arisen as to how we will separate components in terms of
distinct browser pages. (Will things be on separate server-prepared pages or
will the JavaScript manipulate the one page accordingly).

We have settled on a mid-way solution. Each component (ie. the file browser,
the text editor), will have a distinct browser page with its own HTML,
JavaScript code, etc.

The choice of how to split up pages within each component is up to that
component. Most components will use JavaScript so they will have just a single
page.

The file browser will be a single page which uses JavaScript internally to
navigate around. So clicking on subdirectories will not reload a new page, it
will just change the current page.

The editor will of course be just a single page.

Architecture
------------

The server side is shared between the file browser and editor. It is written
in Python and acts as basically a "shell" to the file system and subversion
workspace.

Essentially it takes input in the form of an HTTP Request (GET and POST
accordingly), and returns material primarily as [JSON](http://www.json.org)
data. JSON is extremely easy to write and read in both Python and JavaScript.
It is effectively the common subset of JavaScript and Python data.

For instance, the client may wish to perform an "ls" command. Since this has
no side-effects on the server, it sends an "ls" request using GET to pass the
path name. The server then returns a directory listing in JSON which might
look like this:

        [
            {"svnstatus": "unversioned", "isdir": true, "size": 4096,
                "mtime": "Fri Dec 7 16:27:54 2007", "filename": "subdir"},
            {"svnstatus": "normal", "isdir": false, "size": 22,
                "mtime": "Fri Dec 7 12:21:24 2007", "filename": "data"}
        ]

This nicely separates the client/server with the server being completely
independent of the interface and the client being able to make things happen
by calling simple commands via Ajax.

Browser Interface
-----------------

The interface is split into 4 main sections. These parallel a common file
browser paradigm. The interface is designed to be familiar to Windows
Explorer, etc, but adapted for the browser.

Along the top there is the location bar. This contains a clickable set of
links showing the current directory path.

The main part of the page is the file list. This is a HTML table consisting of
the following columns:

* Checkboxes, for file selection.
* Icon (tooltip: textual file type)
* SVN Status icon (tooltip: textual SVN status)
* Filename (hyperlink, tooltip if the filename had to be condensed)
* Size (natural units)
* Date modified (naturalised, tooltip: full date)

Column headers are all clickable for sorting. All sorting is handled on the
client side (note: the prototype does sorting on the server, this will
disappear).

We try to represent information rather compactly in the table view. Tooltips
and/or sidebar gives more information. This is why there are tooltips for
basically each column giving additional info.

SVN Status icons are a separate column from the main one but represent the
same as TortoiseSVN. For example, green ticks for "normal", red bangs for
"modified", etc.

Filenames are condensed in the middle (so you see a fixed number of chars at
the beginning and end. For instance "A very long file with a long name" is
condensed into "A very long...long name").

Dates are condensed according to a "naturalisation" algorithm. Files modified
today or yesterday show "today" or "yesterday" accordingly, and the time.
Files modified in the last 5 days show "3 days ago". Other files just show the
date. The tooltip always gives the full date and time.

Along the bottom is a status bar showing some static things about the current
directory.

The main feature of interest is the side panel, which shows information and
buttons about the selected file(s). Note that in the prototype we have buttons
in the file list, which is quite ugly and difficult to use. It is much more
natural to select the files, then act on them. See "side panel" later.

### File selection ###

There are always 0 or more files selected. Selection can be controlled
precisely by checking or unchecking the checkboxes on the side. Clicking a
file's name selects it and deselects all the others. If we can detect Ctrl and
Shift we can do better selection algorithms.

Graphically I am picturing the file list rows to be shaded as:

* Interlacing shades of grey for deselected files.
* Interlacing shades of blue for selected files.
* White for rows with the mouse hovering.

### Side panel ###

The side panel is a dynamic area which changes whenever the selections change.
It displays detailed information and actions pertaining to the
currently-selected file(s).

If only one file is selected, it displays all the details about that file (eg.
file size, full date and time, and the widest range of buttons).

The buttons are:

* For Python files: "Run in Browser" and "Run in Console".
* For HTML files, PDFs, images, even text files, any other content that web
  browsers natively recognise: "View in Browser" (or just "Open").
* For directories: "Open"
* Edit (perhaps only for non-binary files - is there any point in letting
  students open binary files in the text editor? This could just be confusing
  as students might expect to see an image editor, for example)
* Rename

If multiple files are selected, it just displays the number of files, and
their total size.

The following buttons are available no matter how many files are selected (at
least 1):

* Download
* Cut (see "copy-paste")
* Copy

Finally there are the Subversion buttons. These vary depending on not only the
files selected, but their SVN statuses.

If just one file is selected, you see the following buttons:

* "Add", if the file is unversioned.
* "Commit", if the file is added, modified, etc.
* "Check for updates", always.

There may be others such as log, diff, depending on how detailed we go into
SVN.

If multiple files are selected, the "add" and "commit" buttons are visible if
one or more files are applicable to that button. However, to prevent
misunderstandings, only one button is ever seen at any time (with "add" taking
precedence). This way, if the user selects modified AND unversioned files,
they may click "commit" thinking it will add the unversioned ones (it won't).
So they are forced to click "add" first, then "commit".

"Check for updates" and "Commit all" will be available from the top toolbar
which applies to the whole directory and its subdirectories.

#### Discussion: Add and commit combined? ####

We don't really need separate "add" and "commit". Because you can selectively
commit, we may just dumb it down to having "commit" available on unversioned
files, and it automatically adds. You just select all the files you want to
add and hit "commit", along with any other files you changed.

### Opening the editor ###

The editor is a separate page. If a file is to be edited, it tries to open it
in a new window. This should encourage students to use browser tabs.

Directory-wide actions
----------------------

Some actions can be performed on the entire directory. These should also
appear in the side-bar, but in a separate section. Or they could be in a
toolbar along the top. They are:

* Paste
* Upload file
* New file (opens the editor)
* Check for updates
* Commit all

Mime type detection and usage
-----------------------------

We can use Python's builtin mimetypes module to detect mime types of the
files. Python should send the mime types along with the listing info.

We use mime types for the following purposes:

* File type icons and descriptions (note: Need a mapping from mime type to
  friendly description, eg "text/python-src" to "Python source code").
* Image types have previews in the side panel.
* Determining other actions. eg. Python source can be executed. HTML source
  and PDF files can be viewed in the browser.
* Editor warnings for binary types (though this may be best if we warn based
  on whether it contains invalid unicode chars instead).

Copy-paste
----------

We will have a full cut-copy-paste paradigm just the same as how modern
desktop file browsers work. The "clipboard" will be stored just on the client
side, as a global JavaScript variable, so it is not shared across browser
sessions or windows. (*Should it be?*)

Quite simply, "copy" replaces the clipboard with a "copy" action associated
with the selected files. "cut" does the same but associates a "move" action.
(Also shades the cut files somehow differently). "paste" executes the copy or
move.

Discussion: Trash bin?
----------------------

Do we need a trash bin, given that we're using Subversion? Students should
realise that "temporary files" are just that - if you delete them, they're
gone. "Permanent files" can be recovered (but we should make that process less
painful than it is currently in Subversion).

Perhaps "novice mode" should have a trash bin but expert mode should rely on
Subversion? (Will the transition be jarring??)

Editor Interface
----------------

The editor page will be a modified version of EditArea (basically with a
modified toolbar).

It will interact with the server simply as it reads and writes files, and also
has limited Subversion access.

The four major features being added to EditArea are:

* Save. Saves the file to a location in the user's directory (prompting first
  if it doesn't yet exist). Also Save As. Very familiar.
* Save and Commit. Saves the file AND automatically SVN commits.
* Reload. Reloads the file from the student's directory.
* Check for updates. Does a SVN update of the file and loads it. (Is this a
  bad idea?)

Note that EditArea's existing "save" feature is actually going to make the
browser offer the file as a download. This will be renamed to "download".

Commit logs
-----------

All the commit features will prompt for a commit log (either a JS prompt() or
a nicer popup floating element). But the commit log is an optional feature
which is turned off by default. That is, by default a log message like "No log
message provided." is written to the log. Once students are more familiar with
SVN, they can turn on log messages to be prompted when they commit.

(Alternatively this feature may automatically come with the "advanced"
interface).