~drizzle-trunk/drizzle/development

Viewing all changes in revision 1579.3.6.

  • Committer: Stewart Smith
  • Date: 2010-06-03 04:50:43 UTC
  • mto: This revision was merged to the branch mainline in revision 1590.
  • Revision ID: stewart@flamingspork.com-20100603045043-d4l7hddapo727kuj
add a too_many_enum_options table to tableprototester. It seems as if we don't get a corruption warning/error if an engine presents a table with > 2^16 enum options (anything over 2^16 is not representable in 2 bytes of storage, so is invalid).

expand all expand all

Show diffs side-by-side

added added

removed removed

Lines of Context: