1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
|
# Originally taken from rpl_mystery22.test,
# but this row-based-replication test has a totally different spirit:
# slave will not stop because of dup key,
# instead we test if it does overwrite the dup key
# as expected.
-- source include/have_binlog_format_row.inc
-- source include/master-slave.inc
# first, cause a duplicate key problem on the slave
create table t1(n int auto_increment primary key, s char(10));
sync_slave_with_master;
# bug#31552/31609 idempotency is not default any longer
# so that the declared in heading comments aim of the test
# should be backed up with explicit setting of the slave mode
set @@global.slave_exec_mode= 'IDEMPOTENT';
insert into t1 values (2,'old');
connection master;
insert into t1 values(NULL,'new');
insert into t1 values(NULL,'new');
save_master_pos;
connection slave;
sync_with_master;
select * from t1 order by n;
delete from t1 where n = 2;
--disable_warnings
start slave;
--enable_warnings
sync_with_master;
stop slave;
connection master;
create table t2(n int);
drop table t2;
insert into t1 values(NULL,'new');
# what happens when we delete a row which does not exist on slave?
set sql_log_bin=0;
insert into t1 values(NULL,'new');
set sql_log_bin=1;
delete from t1 where n=4;
save_master_pos;
connection slave;
--disable_warnings
start slave;
--enable_warnings
sync_with_master;
select * from t1 order by n;
#clean up
connection master;
drop table t1;
sync_slave_with_master;
set @@global.slave_exec_mode= default;
|