~drizzle-trunk/drizzle/development

« back to all changes in this revision

Viewing changes to tests/r/lock_multi.result

  • Committer: Stewart Smith
  • Date: 2009-04-08 06:29:19 UTC
  • mto: This revision was merged to the branch mainline in revision 980.
  • Revision ID: stewart@flamingspork.com-20090408062919-8ojgibrlbbbx161x
fix lock_multi test. LOW_PRIORITY isn't really, so we shouldn't test it being so.

Show diffs side-by-side

added added

removed removed

Lines of Context:
1
1
drop table if exists t1,t2;
2
2
create table t1(n int);
3
3
insert into t1 values (1);
4
 
lock tables t1 write;
5
 
update low_priority t1 set n = 4;
6
 
select n from t1;
7
 
unlock tables;
8
 
n
9
 
1
10
 
drop table t1;
11
 
create table t1(n int);
12
 
insert into t1 values (1);
13
4
lock tables t1 read;
14
5
update low_priority t1 set n = 4;
15
6
select n from t1;